Theology of the Groomer

 This year was the "Year of the Groomer" were disturbing tik tok teachers made the news by exposing innocent children to depraved sexual education and confusexual theory. However, there is another major groomer sect. It's the Novus Ordo Sect, which most people think it's the Catholic Church.

Just like your local school groomer, the novus ordo sect has officially endorsed depraved sexual education curriculums; and just like American public schools, the sect has a problem with high level groomer pederasts. I know that those who belong to the sect are offended by the fact that I am calling their leaders a child-rape group and a false religion, but before you click the exit button, please give a chance to what I will proceed to say. It is important.  

On 2016, news were made that the Vatican had released an indecent sex education manual that included graphic depictions of nudity & eroticism. It seems that it has been successfully memory-holed, because when I clicked on the links on the website that had reported it back in the time, they had a 404 error; the program itself seems to have been purified from its original content. This may be good thing but the problem is that the essence of the pamphlets remains. 

Those interested on reading the full sex-ed program in detail, can do so here, but I don't recommend it. It is too much cringe. 

However, some repulsive obscene images can still be found: 

The Image has been Censored by Me

Most of the pornographic comic books shown by accounts like Libs of Tik Tok are usually drawings and cartoons. However, this image offered a strongly photo-realistic depiction of human genitalia. Where parents warned their children would be looking at this pictures? Are students allowed to opt out of the class? 

It is also true that the program is aimed at older students, but nevertheless, I can testify that for most students dealing with such topics in a mixed classroom is uncomfortable, and that it may very well be an occasion of sin. 

The program uses the typical "Movie-Clip-Evangelization", in which students are shown different shorts that allegedly illustrate a certain teaching. This particular program has a very wide, sometimes out-of-context movie selection. Some of the films have little to do with sexuality, like Lord of the Rings or The Revenge of the Sith. However, that is better than other movies on the program that do speak about sex, for they have inappropriate sexual content. 

This people, probably advised by clerics, thought that it would be a good idea to teach sexual morality by showing young students clips of lewd Hollywood productions. What could possibly go wrong? 

True, students are not shown the whole movie, but I think it is important to recall that these films will be glorified or endorsed if they are used to "show the truths" of Christian theology. They will think "O, this movie is innocent! We saw it in catechism class!" and proceed to watch the whole thing, only to be scandalized by the actual content of the film. The edgy student who was forced to assist a course of novus ordo-approved sex-ed and was shown "the elements of truth" of R-rated films, will probably proceed to watch this or worse. 

Students are asked to comment on a scene from Moulin Rouge, a musical drama narrating the story of a burlesque dancer who falls in love. She tries to maintain her relationship healthy while hooking an evil rich man who will fund the brothel. 

This film is rated PG-13 but it is definitely not appropriate for young people. A woman attempts to rape a man, a man attempts to rape a woman, and the whole cabaret ambient is disturbing and sinful. Why would anybody wish to introduce young people to this movie? 

In this screenshot we can see that children are shown a scene from a film called Love and Other Drugs, an R rated movie full of sexual content and indecency. 

From IMDB, we learn the statistics:

- 48 F-bombs, 1 obscene hand gesture, 38 sexual references, 22 rude anatomical words

- Drugs: marijuana and alcohol, as well as the pill used to breed easy

- Lots of R-rated sex scenes (disturbing and graphic)

Common Sense Media rates it according to the content that is inappropriate:

5 points on sexual content

3 points on drugs and drinking

4 points on language

Meanwhile, positive messages and positive role models only get 2. People who give their comments say it has too much nudity, it's not suitable for people under 15, it's disturbing, it's not for teens, and it may have been very well a porn movie. 

"O, but you have not seen the film!" I don't care, because I promise you that if I had seen the film, my criticism would be stronger than those on Common Sense Media. Therefore, I think this comments are more than enough. 

Plus, just look at the hypocrisy: the movie below it is a christian short about why should not have sex until marriage. What is the purpose of reminding them of this if they are then shown a movie-clip about the sexual adventures of a Pfizer employee?  It is clear that this people are out of their minds. Why would anyone want to show Love & Other Drugs to a group of students? 

Other film found on the list is As Good As It Gets. In therms of nudity & obscenity, it seems that this film is less worse than Love and Other Drugs, however, it still has this aspects. 

For example, a man licks a woman over a coach after she asked for the bed; a male prostitute makes crude poses for a painting, and one of the characters is a sodomite. Would you let a mixed group of young "catholic" students to watch this movie? 

Scenes from the R-Rated film "To the Wonder" are also included, despite nudity, and depraved sexual scenes. What's next, the elements of truth of Hellraiser and Saw?