Millstones on the Road X: Children Need Purity

 Sex is everywhere in our society, and there is a push to sexualize your children as much as possible. Your movies don't escape this. The over sexualization of children is not as strong in the film industry as it is in the school system, but it exists, and this is what we are discussing today.

Over sexualization of children is one of the most disturbing things that happen. You had Saloon trying to get sympathy for a pedophile, and to my understanding, Lolita is not banned. Everyone was righteously angered when Netflix made the movie Cuties. It was outrageous, but how about subtle sexualization? 

Heather has Two Mommies

Sodomites can't breed, and that is why they are coming for your children. Beware of books like Heather Has Two Mommies, I am Jazz, Julian is a Mermaid, and anything else with a Stonewall award. Life Site News as well as Daily Wire always reports every time a movie or Tv show displays sodomite characters, and Breitbart News made an article showing which shows and movies have sodomite characters. Lot's have been written on the subject, so look at their articles. But there isn't a lot to say about boys being told wearnig dresses is cool, except that it is a stupid scandal and abusive.  

It is absolutely outrageous that they would put sodomite characters in tv shows for the purpose of "diversity and tolerance". This deviants are obsessed with putting drag queens in programs directed at young children, and then they complain that they aren't represented enough. The only representation sodomites who want to pervert children deserve is representation in death penalty sentences. (1) 

Double Entendre Jokes

Children movies are saturated with double entendre jokes. Considering that parents are willing to watch a film with the kids as long as they want to see it, why should you attract parents with filthy sexual jokes? It's a little bit disturbing to rejoice in obscene jokes in a movie for kids, which are meant to be innocent. 

I read the jokes from various film like Flushed Out, the Goonies, Over the Hedge and Madagascar and those who were not vulgar were very good, likely to entertain both children and adults. What's the need then for the obscene jokes? It is true that children don't understand them, but they will listen to them and when they finally learn about sex, well, they think its all right. 

I don't really this bad taste humour has really damaged children, compared with the "be-yourself message" which is everywere. But since it is indecent, I will attack it. 

Zootopia has a scene in which Judy and Nick visit a group of animals without clothes. At all. But this is a world in which all animals wear clothes, like humans. It really makes me wonder. They're perverts.  

Madagascar has a song who goes "Let's go to move it, move it" while thousands of lemurs sway their hips to night club style music, how do you feel? It tells the kids that "move it move it" is fine. These are sexual dances, don't lie to me.

When actress Rosie Perez was shown her character for "El Dorado", she asked "are you sure this is family programming?". "Chel" looks like this. It is rumored by the geeks that she is a prostitute. While that may be discutible, it is true that her design is as immodest as an anime character.

 Stickman version of Chel, drawn by me

Another immodest character is He-Man, from Masters of the Universe.

 Stickman version of He-Man, drawn by me

In Bee Movie, Barry goes out with Vanessa and it is implied they love each other. A bee and a human. The judge asks them if they are in a relationship, using wording that I refuse to publish here because it may be an ocassion of sin. 

Caution: The following joke is very sick. Although I don't think it may be an ocassoin of sin, if you are sensitive, weak person, please make a favor to yourself and skip the following paragraphs. 

Show Dogs is a 2018 movie about a talking cop dog infiltrating a show dogs competence to save a trafficked panda. It looks like show dogs get their genitals touched by the judges in order to check how healthy they are or something (I think it's inappropriate, btw), so the very healthy producers thought it was a good idea to make the following joke. Reported by libtard magazine Indie Wire: 

"Cineplex Australia has dropped “Show Dogs” from its theaters, and the NCOSE is calling on America’s two largest theater chains, AMC and Regal, to pull the film as well. In a second statement, the group’s executive director said the movie contains “essentially a sextortion scenario” and “a textbook sexual abuser move — it would be impossible to calculate the number of times sexual abusers coerce minors into various sexual activities (everything from sending nude pictures to sex trafficking them) by using the threat of something bad happening to someone else if they don’t comply.

The National Center on Sexual Exploitation has scolded Will Arnett’s latest film, the PG-rated “Show Dogs,” as potentially dangerous viewing for kids. While the May 18 release sounds innocent, if a bit perplexing — a police dog (voiced by Chris “Ludacris” Bridges) infiltrates a Vegas canine competition to save a stolen panda — but the nonprofit claims the caper “sends a troubling message that grooms children for sexual abuse.”

In a Tuesday statement published on the center’s website, NCOSE executive director Dawn Hawkins called out “multiple scenes where a dog character must have its private parts inspected, in the course of which the dog is uncomfortable and wants to stop but is told to go to a ‘zen place,’” content expected to raise film executives’ eyebrows.

Hawkins continued, “The dog is rewarded with advancing to the final round of the dog show after passing this barrier. Disturbingly, these are similar tactics child abusers use when grooming children — telling them to pretend they are somewhere else, and that they will get a reward for withstanding their discomfort. Children’s movies must be held to a higher standard, and must teach children bodily autonomy, the ability to say ‘no,’ and safety, not confusing messages endorsing unwanted genital touching."

I know real show dogs have their sexual organs touched. I don`t care - this are antropomorphic animals. The kids relate to them. Max is a dog and a human at the same time. The kids could be told by any potential abuser that they could go to their "zen place" like in the movie and groping and abusing them it`s all right. 

If they have already seen the movie, please explain to them that no one has the right to touch them without their consent, even if it is a teacher or an uncle, and that if it ever happens they must tell it to you. Also, if you have not unsuscribed from Netflix after the Cuties scandal, you are a hypocrite. Giving money to Netflix after promoting a movie that sexualizes 4 girl actresses it`s no different from making groping jokes in a movie for kids.   

It seems that the scenes were cut from the house version in the US. This is not so for Britain and Ireland. I ignore about any other countries. Neverthless, the joke is so untasty that you shouldn`t even look at the movie. Don`t throw your precious money to this beasts. 

Most of the other jokes we won't mention, because this is not a collection of double entendre humor. I just mentioned the ones that are obvious or particularly grotesque. 

Boy Bands for Girls: Do they Glorify Groupie Culture? 

Does anyone remember Justin Bieber? When he was 12 years old he became a musical star and every girl who wasn't a hater was fawning over him. The same happened with One Direction some years later and now with BTS. The weird thing is that this boys were seen by girls as some sort of potential mates. They were sexualized, and that's wrong because it shows a lack of respect towards them and their privacy, gives the stars undue attention and it is kind of abusive, particularly with Bieber because he was still a young child. Girls salivating at how handsome they are and how much they will like to marry them. Believe me, I was there when they were popular.

I am not saying all boy-band fans are sexualizing their muscicians. Some of them only like the music and they like the guys, albeit not in a sexual way. It's just that the way some women treat famous handsome guys is an ocassion of sin.  

Now, it is normal for girls to desire a husband. We also see this in fairy tales when they wish to marry a prince. Most people marry, and for many women, a perfect marriage with children is a perfect dream. Plus, they want to imitate their mothers, who are likely to be married or have a male partner at least.   

But there is a difference between wishing to marry a prince or a decent man, and marrying Harry Styles or Louis Tomlinson. This guys are popstars, celebrities, men of the world. Perhaps none of this popies has serious issues with drugs and violence, but seriously, do you really want our daughter to marry Harry Styles? 

Dressed like a woman 

 

(Source: The Telegraph)

Harry Styles here is making an obscene signal. 

The BTS guys may be better but you've got to admit they look effeminate. 

 (source: Standard.Co.Uk)

It's like a conspiracy to make your girls attracted to effeminate men, isn't it? 

Everybody knows that celebrites are excellent handling relationships. I don't want to be too mean with them because the whole musick industry is absolutely diabolical for both stars and fans, but my point remains that celebrities are not good potential husbands. 

Just as "Rock Dog" prepares your children to consume records when they are too old to consume cartoons, Boy Bands prepare girls to accept groupie culture as normal. Groupie culture is girls selling themselves to the popstars, but it may also include those girls who have their secret list of handsome celebrities and expose themselves to occasions of sin. Groupie culture is the sacred prostitution of the diabolical cult known as musick industry. 

Grupie culture is further pushed when the lyrics of the songs are suggestive. Reading some of the songs from the official website, I found out that even though One Direction's songs don't tend to be outrageously depraved, they do have some mild language that may be suggestive. Anyway, remember the boiling frog? 

The 6 Year Old High Schooler

This part of the post is not so much about disturbing over sexualization, but it is related so pay attention: 

There is a weird tendency to make high-school stories, which will in turn be watched by young girls.  As you can imagine, many of the plots will be related to love relationships and boyfriends: 

A list includes: 

High School Musical 

Monster High 

Ever After High 

(picturefrom You Tube)

Canterlot High, literally My Little Pony High 

(picture from Wikia)

Starstruck 

Lemonade

Camp Rock  

Big Time Rush 

Hannah Montana 

Again, girls are always interested on partners because they may wish to marry. But you know, there is a difference between a princess who always marries her prince and high school relationships that may be less modest than Catholic courting. 

With Hannah Montana, things turn specially sick. Sold to the celebrity industry since eleven, Miley Cyrus was transformed froma "cute, innocent girl", into the last thing you want your girl to be: a self-prostituting, awfully degenerate whore whose only purpose in life is fame, idleness and the excruciating effort of satisfying the greed of ultra perverse managers. This tendency of turning an innocent ikon into a monstruous pervert also happened with rapper Lil Nas X, who one year was making sing-alongs with Elmo and books for children, and the next one he was twerking with the devil and dressing like a woman. 

I am merely questioning if the portrayal of love relationiships this shows and films offer is appropiate for girls - specially six year old girls. After all, romantic stories tend to inflate the passions of women more than they can with men. Do they encourage long-lasting, healthy relationships or fornicarial, "toxic" luv? While do to time restraints I can't research tv shows because they are more complex than movies, this is a question I want all the parents of young girls to consider. 

CONCLUSION 

The issue we are discussing is much more serious outside of media for children: transgender men in bathrooms, the transgendering of children, sex education, critical gender theory, sex abuse, traffickers and pornography found online are much more severe than a few jokes. But I think this post will make you to think. Do you want to fund the perverts who designed Chel? Do you want to fund the perverts who sold Justin Bieber and who would like to sell your girls and convert them into Miley Cyrus clones? I don't think so. 

I recommend prayers to the Blessed Virgin Mary, and further reading: 

Preparation for Death, by St. Alphonsus 

The Glories of Mary by St. Alphonsus

Moral Theology by McHugh and Callan.  

1) Before you misrepresent me, I don't believe all sodomites deserve the death penalty. Only those who "are coming for your children", albeit, there is a disproportionate amount of them between the lgbt community.